Digital Power Makes Complexity Simple

by donpedro

The number of mobile broadband subscriptions has grown by around 45% year-on-year reaching 1.7 billion in 2012, according to data released in the latest Ericsson Mobility Report1). Additionally, there also is steady progress in the amount of data usage per subscription. This increase in mobile data combined with the growing deployment of the high-speed internet infrastructure via fiber-to-home means that manufacturers in ICT applications are being required to develop ever higher performing and higher capacity equipment in a shorter time-to-market, while also implementing the latest hardware and software technologies to ensure low energy consumption.
This is a challenging situation, but it does generate many opportunities to develop new ways of managing board power. For example, moving from passive ‘Board Mounted Power Sources’ (BMPS) that only supply power to loads, to very advanced combinations of hardware and software that make a contribution towards the full integration of board power within the digital chain.

1) Ericsson Mobility Report:

Author: Patrick Le Fèvre, Marketing and Communication Director at Ericsson Power Modules

Pushing the limits

The challenge for the board power system designer is to predict what will be required in terms of increasing power, decreasing board-space, higher flexibility and lower power consumption by the final end-application network data processor. Leading-edge equipment designed to handle high levels of data traffic is often based on multiple cores or processors that are not always fully available at the time of system development. And this equipment requires highly sophisticated power management with power sequencing, monitoring and the capability to dynamically modify an element of the power scheme to adjust to traffic conditions and thereby enable a reduction in energy consumption. An example of this type of complex equipment – an Ericsson high-end subscriber management and routing board – is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Ericsson’s high-end subscriber management and routing board.

In the high-end data processing world, the divergence in terms of power demand and flexibility is reaching an unprecedented level. The time-to-market to support network expansion is becoming ever shorter, while the increase of computing power per network controller is running at a similar rate. Board system architects therefore often find ‘moving goalposts’ when estimating power demand via simulation to match the power required by the actual end application when the system processors reach production maturity.

Complex sequencing is fun

Because network-processors are very complex – and each new evolution integrates more functionality – the current required by the processor could increase by up to 60% from the preliminary specification of the processor to the mature version. Clearly, an evolving processor makes it difficult for board power designers to define the most efficient power architecture for the application. In addition to the increase of power required by the processor, revision after revision, the voltage sequencing is crucial and also has to evolve in step with the development of the processor. This means that designers will have to reset the voltage-sequencing scheme with each new revision.
Furthermore, as well as the power and sequencing plan, when the board is finally released, during the lifetime of the equipment, network processors will be subject to firmware upgrades that may require different sequencing values to optimize operation and reduce energy consumption. In this type of application it is problematic in the extreme to use conventional power architectures, such as implementing analog point-of-load (POL) regulators with a sequencing setup via physical resistors, which will require hardware modifications and make lifetime upgrades almost impossible.
To solve the complex equation of setting the power architecture in parallel with the application development, and to guarantee full lifetime optimization, board power designers are increasingly implementing digitally controlled power architectures that combine digital POL regulators. These can be paralleled to achieve the level of power required by the processor (see figure 2), in conjunction with the flexibility offered by programming the setup sequencing using software such as Ericsson Power Designer (see figure 3), which makes it possible to create specific configurations for power rails and to modify configuration at any time without requiring hardware changes.

Figure 2: A digital POL regulator in single in-line packaging saving board space and improving cooling.

Because varying type of processors and other strategic components such as memories require different types of sequencing on the same board, power architects have often to set up different sequencing schemes, such as Time Based, Event Based, Group Communication Bus Based and Voltage Tracking. As shown in figure 3, setting parameters for any type of sequencing is very simple and can be achieved via software. The example presented in figure 4 shows time-based sequencing in which delays, rise-time and fall-time are based on processor specifications.

Figure 3: Ericsson Power Designer sequencing.

Figure 4: Time-based sequencing – Rise-time and fall-time.

In this configuration, the 1.0V core voltage must ramp slowly over 30 milliseconds, while the auxiliary voltages ramp up earlier – within 10 milliseconds – to power supervisory functions, ensuring they are operating before the core turns on. During the shutdown, all voltages are switched off at the same time, within 10 milliseconds; however, the fall-time is adjusted to guarantee smooth transition until all functions are switched off.
As shown in figure 5, systems using digital power architecture are extremely flexible and the site manager can access any part of the board, down to a single POL through the digital interface.

Figure 5: System overview.

Powering the core while saving energy

Over many years the semiconductor industry has drastically optimized energy usage with built-in processor energy management that has significantly improved performance and reduced energy consumption. The high-end processors used in data networking have a greater number of cores per processor and more power requires ever-shrinking process technologies, resulting in lower voltages and higher currents.
Core voltage is now in the range of 1V and below, with current up to 90A per processor operating at full capacity, but at 10A and below, when operating in a lower utilization mode. To power processors efficiently, power designers are exploiting another benefit offered by digital power, which is to connect a number of digital POLs in parallel.
For example, implementing three 40A POLs to guarantee 100A across all conditions and using the benefits of phase spreading to decrease ripple and noise at full power and phase shading to reduce the number of POLs in operation when not required. Although usually complex to manage, the implementation of this type of functionality with digital POLs makes it very simple in practice.
Figure 6 shows how phases can be adjusted when using Ericsson Power Designer. As for the sequencing shown previously, phase spreading and phase shading can be simply programmed. In addition, systems architect can develop multiple configuration files to meet certain profiles that can be called up by the board power manager from local storage.

Figure 6: Phase spreading.

In some applications, the processor directly communicates with the board power manager to set the number of phases required for optimized performances and how those phases should be shifted or synchronized. This simple example provides an idea of the huge potential offered by digital POLs directly communicating with the master processor.

Monitoring and energy reporting

Energy regulations and the growing importance for network operators to reduce energy consumption are adding to the demands upon board power designers to report the power consumption of each board, which requires additional current sensing and other circuitry. Systems architects working on Advanced Telecom Computing Architecture (ATCA) applications are implementing Power Interface Modules (PIMs) with a built-in PMBus controller that is able to monitor current consumption at any time of operation and to report accurate power measurement.
Current monitoring via the PMBus is available via any digital power module, isolated or non-isolated, simplifying energy monitoring and offering the possibility to supervise the overall system. Digital power modules also include a large number of alarms that can be programmed to report deviation from any default, in addition to temperature monitoring. While it is a clear advantage to know the temperature of the Advanced Bus Converter or POL regulator, the real benefit is to help systems managers to diagnose any abnormal deviation before reaching alarm level. Abnormal deviation from calibrated configuration could easily be the sign of forthcoming failure, trigging a request for preventive maintenance and therefore avoiding traffic disruption and loss of revenues.

Board space saving and temperature mapping

In addition to reducing time-to-market and energy consumption, saving board space to accommodate additional data processing capability is another challenge faced by systems designers. This often comes with another challenge: that of limiting the airflow bottleneck and optimizing cooling to achieve the highest performance from the network processor without overheating.
Saving board space is often achieved by implementing vertically mounted single in-line POLs. In addition to highly efficient power conversion, additional monitoring features built into digital POLs, such as current, voltage, temperature, alarms, parameter settings and many others that are therefore no longer required as separate functions, represent a significant board saving, thereby freeing space for additional computing power.
Gathering temperature information from a large number of points within a board can also be used by systems managers to create a thermal picture of the complete board, which besides detecting early failure is also used to adjust cooling to what is required by the system. In previous generation of systems, thermal mapping relied upon a network of thermocouples requiring additional circuitry, calibration and complexity, which can highly be simplified when implementing digital POLs with this built-in functionality. Thermal data collected by each POL represents valuable information for systems architects looking to optimize overall board cooling.


This article briefly reviewed a few possibilities of digital power technology and how power systems architects are implementing this technology. It also looked at how applications such as dynamic bus voltage technology can adjust the intermediate bus to meet the required load, or how fragmented distributed power combining multiple Advanced Bus Converters can on request become master, slave or sleep devices. To conclude, digital power is fun and also makes complexity simple.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment